Sometimes, even as clearly as many rules of language are defined, the intent of the writer is still ambiguous. I don’t know if I think about it too much, but sometimes it bugs me that I don’t really know what is supposed to be being communicated. As I was shopping yesterday, I bought a snack package that describes itself as:
Chocolate and yogurt-covered peanuts and raisins
Unfortunately, this could mean any of the following:
Chocolate, plus yogurt-covered peanuts and plain raisins
Chocolate, plus yogurt-covered peanuts and yogurt-covered raisins
Chocolate-covered peanuts, plus yogurt-covered peanuts, and plain raisins
Chocolate-covered peanuts, plus yogurt-covered peanuts, and yogurt-covered raisins
Chocolate-covered peanuts, yogurt-covered peanuts, chocolate-covered raisins, and yogurt-covered raisins
Chocolate, plus yogurt-covered peanuts, and yogurt-covered raisins
Chocolate and yogurt-covered peanuts, and plain raisins
Chocolate and yogurt-covered peanuts, and chocolate and yogurt-covered raisins
…and there are other potential interpretations as well.
Before I reveal what was actually in the package, I have a potential solution to this problem. As a software developer, I’ve had to learn to be absolutely clear about my intent when writing logic statements so the computer can follow my instructions explicitly. This is done by grouping related portions of an expression using parentheses. So, the above statement should be written:
(Chocolate or Yogurt) covered (Peanuts and Raisins)
This is much more clear, but even that doesn’t describe what was actually in the package. To be fully accurate in the description of the contents of the package, the statement would have to be:
(Plain or chocolate-covered or yogurt-covered) (peanuts and raisins).
This is a lot easier than:
Peanuts, raisins, chocolate-covered peanuts, chocolate-covered raisins,
yogurt-covered peanuts, and yogurt-covered raisins.
See how much easier it is when you include the parenthetical markings? Now we just need to figure out how to communicate this statement verbally.
1 comment:
HAHA!! Love this!
Post a Comment